Emperor Hirohito’s Surrender
speech, Winston Churchill’s, “Blood, Toil, Sweat, and Tears” (speech),
Goebbel’s “Nation,
Rise Up, and Let the Storm Break Loose” all use many similar stylistic
devices that alter the readers perception and interpretation of their speeches
and the events occurring.
A prime example lies within the victimizing in
Emperor Hirohito’s Surrender speech and Goebbel’s “Nation, Rise Up, and Let the
Storm Break Loose. Discarding the fact that the Japanese killed innocent
civilians and did extremely detrimental things to those in World War 2 their
main reason for surrendering appeared to be “ the war situation has not
developed not necessarily to Japan’s advantage, while the general trends of the
world have all turned against her interest.” Hirohito’s diction and use of a litote(understatement)
allowed him to victimize Japan rather than taking the actual blame in the
situation. Using similar diction and stylistic devices Goebbels speech on total
war allows him to victimize himself and Germany in their decision to start the
war. “It was two minutes before midnight. Waiting any longer could easily have
led to the destruction of the Reich and a total Bolshevization of the European
continent.” Using slippery slope fallacy Goebbels justifies and victimizes
himself and Germany in their decision.
Another prevalent idea
within Goebbels “Nation, Rise Up, and Let the Storm Break Loose and Winston
Churchill’s, “Blood, Toil, Sweat, and Tears” is to call upon the patriotism and
instill unity within its citizens. At the end of Goebbels speech has a series
of questions that he asks his supporters in the war. “ Are you resolved to
follow the Fuhrer through thick and thin...... Are you and the German people
willing to work, if the Fuhrer orders…..Is your confidence in the Fuhrer
greater……?” These series of rhetorical questions creates a bandwagon effect and
instills patriotism within the reader. Giving an either or fallacy Goebbels
instills guilt in the reader if he does not follow the bandwagon. In Winston
Churchill’s, “Blood, Toil, Sweat, and Tears” Churchill gives the same effect to
his readers by instilling the idea of unity and a “together we can win but
divided we fall apart” effect. “ At this time I feel entitled to claim the aim
of all, and I say, “ Come then, lets go forward together with our united
strength.”” Churchill’s diction with his “entitlement” to ask for help creates
a bandwagon and instills patriotism within the reader.
A common stylistic device
between all three of the World War 2 speeches is by zoomorphism and making
their enemy seem like the most eminent threat in the world. Churchill said “….to
wage a war against a monstrous tyranny, never surpassed in the dark and the
lamentable catalogue of human crime.” Goebbels said “International Jewry is the
devilish ferment of decomposition that finds cynical satisfaction in plunging
the world into the deepest chaos and destroying ancient cultures that it played
no role in building.” Hirohito said “The enemy has begun to employ a new and
most cruel bomb..” All three speeches give the effect that the enemies are the
most important and evil danger in the world.
All three speeches use many similar
stylistic devices that hide the truth by altering the readers perception of the
situations.
I like how you supported your ideas with quotes. Your ideas about how they are similar are good; I like how you included stylistic devices in the similarities. Also, I like how you integrated the quotes so that they weren't just dropped in there. This is good!
ReplyDeleteLike Lindsey, i like how you used quote support, but i think you could have integrated them better. The way you separated you ideas was good, and this blog was overall well written.
ReplyDeleteI liked how you explained what the similarities were with the "literary lingo" and the parenthetical explainations of what they were could be useful to other readers. You had plenty of support for your ideas and connections. Overall, I like this piece!
ReplyDeleteImane, I love how you really leaned into this blog. You're really focusing on the connection between style and content ala the best type of rhetorical analysis. Yay! Your paragraphs touch on specific points; it might be worth picking one or two, instead of three, so you have more space to develop them further, but the ideas are all sound and reasonable. I think "zoomorphism" isn't quite accurate--that would imply people are being turned into animals; in this case, it seems more like "dehumanization" since they turn into monsters and "a devilish ferment."
ReplyDelete